4 ms·
No, the writer arbitrarily decided to interpret illegal moves as resignations in order to support the conclusion they wanted. That's very different and grossly
by swatcoder 4y ago
No, the writer arbitrarily decided to interpret illegal moves as resignations in order to support the conclusion they wanted. That's very different and grossly unscientific.
- epups 4y agoThis is not a scientific paper, and I at least find this decision justified, as he could have been more lenient and grab headlines with a bigger ELO.
- mynameisvlad 4y agoI mean, that's more lenient than the official "interpretation" (rule) which is that your second illegal move results in a forfeit.