3 ms·

ChatGPT did forfeit whenever it made an illegal move, read the article.

• swatcoder 4y ago
  No, the writer arbitrarily decided to interpret illegal moves as resignations in order to support the conclusion they wanted. That's very different and grossly unscientific.
  • epups 4y ago
    This is not a scientific paper, and I at least find this decision justified, as he could have been more lenient and grab headlines with a bigger ELO.
  • mynameisvlad 4y ago
    I mean, that's more lenient than the official "interpretation" (rule) which is that your second illegal move results in a forfeit.