3 ms·
Not if training is unsupervised. If you've never been explicitly told the rules of game, you can never be 100% sure of all possible illegal moves. anyway the
by famouswaffles 4y ago
Not if training is unsupervised. If you've never been explicitly told the rules of game, you can never be 100% sure of all possible illegal moves.
anyway the 3.5 series can't ply chess but gpt-4 certainly can.
- Jensson 4y ago> anyway the 3.5 series can't ply chess but gpt-4 certainly can. This article stated the opposite, gpt-4 couldn't play chess while gpt-3.5 could. So this is a case where the model got dumber.
- famouswaffles 4y agoNot sure what's up but from here https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/11rfbch/gpt4_seems_to_improve_chess_skills_significantly/ https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/11rfbch/gpt4_seems_t... nd here https://twitter.com/zswitten/status/1631107663500304384 https://twitter.com/zswitten/status/1631107663500304384 Gpt-4 plys chess just fine.
- rightbyte 4y agoSurely the rules of chess has to be in the training data 100s of times? Maybe it is not enough.