3 ms·
That’s a bit meaningless without implied population. And it doesn’t tell you much because it depends so much on the particulars (how many years people in that g
by LudwigNagasena 4y ago
That’s a bit meaningless without implied population. And it doesn’t tell you much because it depends so much on the particulars (how many years people in that group spent on chess, how serious they are). I would guess that’s quite different for FIDE and online chess.
Intuitively, I would guess 1400 is the rating of an average kid who spent a year studying chess seriously.
- xapata 4y agoNot the ELO of the average kid who spends a year studying chess seriously? It's very difficult to define the average kid without context. It's been a while since I read a global demographics update, but not all that long ago the mode child would have been living on $2 a day.
- LudwigNagasena 4y agoSure, it’s tricky, but I feel it’s more coherent than “all chess players”.