3 ms·
Except I didn't write that and I will quote myself: >"I can tell you this. I do not know future iterations of LLMs can take over our jobs" I wrote that I don'
by HervalFreire 4y ago
Except I didn't write that and I will quote myself:
>"I can tell you this. I do not know future iterations of LLMs can take over our jobs"
I wrote that I don't know which is the best answer we all have at this point.
Given the evidence, completely denying it, as many have is simply not realistic.
- mostlysimilar 4y agoOkay, but you have another post in this thread with: > When these LLMs get normalized probably 5 years from now I'm going go back to these old threads and contact these people who are in self denial and throw it in their face. I'll just link this comment and be like I TOLD YOU, I TOLD YOU, YOU WERE WRONG.
- HervalFreire 4y agoMy bad. It's the caps. I'll remove the caps. Just picture me saying it a nicer way.
- roflyear 4y agoGloating over people being wrong is rarely nice
- HervalFreire 4y agoNot if it's said in a nice way. The commenter called LLMs a freaking auto complete. That's not nice either, but nice enough for HN. So I figured a little subtle gloating is deserved and well within the bounds of etiquette here on HN.
- roflyear 4y agoWell insulting the capacity of an LLM is much different than gloating over someone being wrong about their livelihood.
- HervalFreire 4y ago[flagged]
- mostlysimilar 4y agoI didn't flag your posts, friend. Even if I dislike the tone I get the impression you're being sincere, and I think they add to the conversation.