> They released LLaMA without any RLHF so it can say anything and is completely unfiltered. An open, untrained model is way more responsible to society than a

> They released LLaMA without any RLHF so it can say anything and is completely unfiltered. An open, untrained model is way more responsible to society than a handful of centralized models that have all been trained to reify a "2020's Professional-Class American Urbanite" worldview and project it upon all users. The latter might sound great to you if that's pretty close to your own worldview right now, but is absurdly short-sighted and presumptuous. The reason Microsoft/OpenAI is doing what they're doing is so that they can quickly sell a low-scandal product to global-wealthy users aligned with that $$$-flooded worldview and secure a business lead on that market. They don't want to offend today's customers and don't have the integrity to think about the long-term global picture for society. Their work is in their interest as a corporation, and perhaps in stroking their own ego as individual researchers. The "safety" language is a cynical rationalization.