4 ms·
I agree with everything, but I also think there might be genuinely by g opportunities here. Idk about teaching kids. At adult, or near adult levels... I think
by dalbasal 4y ago
I agree with everything, but I also think there might be genuinely by g opportunities here.
Idk about teaching kids. At adult, or near adult levels... I think these programs may very quickly be a major learning technology. It's good, sometimes, to have optimism. Optimism, even naive optimism, is often conducive to inventing things.
The guardrail should be in avoiding utopic ideas, like designing things for schoolchildren in remote places^. It's too abstract. Too aloof to be a testbed. TED talking windbags have had their day.
That still leaves plenty of room. A program that can produce exercises and lessons on the fly might be very useful. Thinking big is helpful to discovering what that use is.
The Hegelian pendulum of 2023 is hype driven. Hype, anti-hype. Fanboys. Haters. Ping pong.
The disillusionment of digital utopians, as they watched their creations serve Zuck, SBF, Thiel... dropping out in a cloud of ominous pessimism is no solution either.
- milsorgen 4y ago>Idk about teaching kids. At adult, or near adult levels... I think these programs may very quickly be a major learning technology I concur and I think in terms of children the last thing they need is more (any) technology. They need a solid foundation rooted in human interaction so that they can then leverage these potentially potent tools in effective ways later.