3 ms·
Well the opposite view isn’t really based on science , only in faulty risk mitigation. So is it riskier to let your kid go without knowing for a long time or is
by s1k3 4y ago
Well the opposite view isn’t really based on science , only in faulty risk mitigation. So is it riskier to let your kid go without knowing for a long time or is it better to test in a limited controlled window where you can react and adapt if something goes wrong.
- soperj 4y agoNeither is based on Science when the science is shit. P-hacking isn't science, and yet it gets published as Science all the time, particularly in nutrition studies.