I think that's a very useful distinction. What becomes somewhat obvious after spending any length of time with ChatGPT4 is that it is limited to a particular et

I think that's a very useful distinction. What becomes somewhat obvious after spending any length of time with ChatGPT4 is that it is limited to a particular ethical frame that is unfortunately quite rigid and by no means universal, and sometimes descends into a kind of high-handed moralism. (For example, try discussing whether it is ethical to carry pepper spray for self-defense in dangerous areas.) It's not clear why reasonable moderation from a commercial perspective should also be tethered to particular ethical stances. I wonder if the ethical rigidity is intentional or somehow an inevitable byproduct of a high level of moderation.