3 ms·
> One is the transparent intergration with COM I think this is one of the things detractors of VB kinda miss. You could build quite sophisticated software to l
by teh_klev 4y ago
> One is the transparent intergration with COM
I think this is one of the things detractors of VB kinda miss. You could build quite sophisticated software to leverage COM/DCOM without needing to go full C/C++ and IDL.
The place I worked at built software that ran inside Microsoft Transaction Server (latterly COM+) to exploit distributed transactions.
And then there's the really "advanced" stuff you could do in VB as written about by Matthew Curland in his excellent book "Advanced Visual Basic 6: Power Techniques for Everyday Programs"[0]. Armed with a copy of Curland's book and Don Box's "Essential COM" you could be really dangerous :)
[0]: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Advanced-Visual-Basic-Programming-DevelopMentor/dp/0201707128 https://www.amazon.co.uk/Advanced-Visual-Basic-Programming-D...
- pjmlp 4y agoIt is incredible how on one hand WinDev has doubled down on COM after the way Longhorn was botched and rebooted into Vista,coming up with WinRT afterwards. While on the other hand they keep failing to deliver a VB like experience to deal with all that COM. All C++ improvements were killed in the name of the mighty IDL, and even .NET has always been hit and miss with RCW/CCW, and CsWinRT requires manual boilerplate coding.