41 ms·
Actually looking into it - I still think it's way off. Looking at DataGrip for example, it's only cost comparable if you want the ultra-comprehensive version f
by bluelightning2k 4y ago
Actually looking into it - I still think it's way off.
Looking at DataGrip for example, it's only cost comparable if you want the ultra-comprehensive version for connecting to multiple database types (otherwise it's 3x more expensive).
And DataGrip is clearly only intended for professional DBA's or something close.
This is intended to business-users.
There's also going to be crazy price pressure from GPT4 tools in this segment. Like justifying why having a UI is better and why it should be 10x more expensive all at once.
I think there's a systemic issue here: YC strongly advises raising prices, etc. but it's just hit almost a satirical level. (Launch with MVP-ish features, less distribution advantages, but aim for slightly-premium pricing vs the proven competitors with 500 integrations and 10 years of development).
- indymike 4y agoCould be, but if you look at Preset, you are dealing with honestly a parity product as far as I can tell. > There's also going to be crazy price pressure from GPT4 tools in this segment. Not really, error rate must = 0 for database tools.