4 ms·
It isn't an "interpretation" The wikipedia page literally says that you must end your relationship with the union due to inadequate representation
by kevviiinn 4y ago
It isn't an "interpretation"
The wikipedia page literally says that you must end your relationship with the union due to inadequate representation
- wootland 4y agoIt says that because you can't be in a union and do a wild cat strike. Not in a union? You're free to. You're misreading it. I'd encourage you talk to a lawyer if you have any doubts.
- kevviiinn 4y agoBecause this is what an attorney told you or you're relying on your own interpretation of the plain English text? It's pretty clear, words mean things and I encourage you to look up the definition of words like "request" and "end" and "association" If there isn't a union then it wouldn't be considered a wildcat strike at all, therefore there must be a union at that workplace for it to be considered a wildcat strike and the person must be unassociated with that union due to inadequate representation for it to be a protected wildcat strike https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Wildcat+Strike https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Wildcat+Strik...