24 ms·
From the review comments... > Key Weakness: The paper largely focuses on showing how much emergence occurs in a “sudden” manner, bringing reports from previous
by sublinear 4y ago
From the review comments...
> Key Weakness: The paper largely focuses on showing how much emergence occurs in a “sudden” manner, bringing reports from previous work. It relies on the “magic” of emergence, rather than providing new insights on why this is happening and when it happens/does not happen.
> Requested change: More fundamental evidence on the claim "further scaling will likely endow even-larger language models with new emergent abilities" with more concrete discussion (with possibly evidence) on how those new emergent abilities would look like and how further scaling will be possibly in a approachable way.