> A GPT genuinely designed to be friendly, and convincingly acting friendly If I don't want it to I don't want it to. When I ask it to be sarcastic or make fun

> A GPT genuinely designed to be friendly, and convincingly acting friendly If I don't want it to I don't want it to. When I ask it to be sarcastic or make fun of my condition that's what, what makes me sad is it refusing to. The fact that there are many emotionally vulnerable or wicked people around doesn't mean everybody is and needs to be protected. Every kind of knowledge (except personal data of people who don't consent) should be available, how do the users react to it is their own responsibility (unless they are diagnosed a mental condition which specifically says it is not). I even know many ways to harm people but just don't do that while people who would go on and do, once found guilty, should just be prosecuted the way they normally are. The infantilize everyone and police everything mentality is a major problem our society is facing. I understand the opposite point (and don't insist mine necessarily is the right) but believe this one should also have its place in the discourse.