29 ms·
> derivative work of something in the public domain is itself copyrightable I don't think this is true in most of the world. Here's a UK referience: https://c
by datpiff 4y ago
> derivative work of something in the public domain is itself copyrightable
I don't think this is true in most of the world.
Here's a UK referience:
https://copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p22_derivative_works https://copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p22_derivative_work...
"You cannot extend the duration of copyright in a work by creating a derivative work. If the original work is in the public domain, it will remain in the public domain; you cannot prevent anyone else using the same public domain work for their own purposes."
- vidarh 4y agoWhat you've quoted directly agrees with the interpretation of the person you replied to.
- andreareina 4y agoThe derivative is subject to copyright, the original isn't. If I make a new translation of The Count of Monte Cristo I own the copyright to the translation but not to the original story etc.