4 ms·
I think this is more a problem with centralized services than with Twitter or any particular government. I'm with Dave Winer on this one: http://scripting.com
by joebadmo 15y ago
I think this is more a problem with centralized services than with Twitter or any particular government.
I'm with Dave Winer on this one:
http://scripting.com/stories/2012/01/27/onTwittersNewFiltering.html http://scripting.com/stories/2012/01/27/onTwittersNewFilteri...
- pasbesoin 15y agoBut, as I've pleaded previously, if we force them to shut down the Internet to control the flow of information, everyone will know. If there is an ability to shut off communities selectively, that would be hard to detect. Although Twitter says they will provide removal requests to the Chilling Effects site, I remain skeptical. If nothing else, this seems akin to the increasingly mandated "protest areas" in the U.S. and elsewhere that are well, or thoroughly, removed from the events being protested.
- davewiner 15y agoI'm sure there are requests that governments can make that Twitter will not be able to report to Chilling Effects.
- stfu 15y agoDave: The EC2 tutorial is nicely done. But the problem of setting up an individual communication island seems that "they" will come for those people "personally". While using an existing platform people can "hide" behind proxies, open wlans and so on the required money trail for bringing a personal system online makes the "rule breaker" much more identifiable.
- biafra 15y agoOnly if those request come from the US-Government.