3 ms·
> ways (people on the Internet think) It reminds me of arguments that it's not the computer that plays chess, but its programmers. You can describe a GPT's re
by red75prime 4y ago
> ways (people on the Internet think)
It reminds me of arguments that it's not the computer that plays chess, but its programmers.
You can describe a GPT's response as a statistical average of responses on the internet (for quite a contrived definition of average), but at some point it will be easier to describe it as analyzing a snippet and forming an opinion (based on what people on the Internet think). Are we past that point? I'm not sure yet, but we are close.
- z3c0 4y ago> quite a contrived definition of average Sure, maybe an argmax mixed with an RNG isn't really an average, but some would say it's quite a contrived definition of forming an opinion.
- red75prime 4y agoargmax is doing all the heavy lifting there. Consider argmax is_proof_of_P_eq_NP(string) You can describe solution of any well defined problem with argmax, it doesn't make it trivial.