2 ms·
I think it will be a bit of both, why reach for that module when you can just get AI to write the 10% you need so quickly? (Which is actually a net gain I think
by zenlikethat 4y ago
I think it will be a bit of both, why reach for that module when you can just get AI to write the 10% you need so quickly? (Which is actually a net gain I think in many cases, just look at leftpad drama) But the productivity boost from AI will also lead to more libraries available that do useful things in the areas it's not so sharp. They will also start to lean in to AI assisted coding styles too of course.
And once we get good tooling to inject in recent data, source code, etc so it can use those as well... gonna be great
- ChatGTP 4y agoI think the end of libraries would be bad, even for LLMs, they're not super intelligence and the more spaghetti code they're asked to work with, the less likely they will be able to perform, because statistically, they will be very hard to grok. It will increasingly have to deal with more and more entropy. Infact, it probably performs so well because of the heavy use of libraries we see today. Also side note: I doubt you're ever going to be able to upload code to an LLM my friend, not a publicly accessible one. It would be quite dangerous? Could you imagine the attacks, the implanting of back doors etc? Don't think so. I'd say scraping the web is probably going to be an increasingly dangerous pursuit for ChatGPT now people are getting to better understand the attack vectors available.
- xwdv 4y agoUltimately if everyone stops writing libraries how will GPT get new data to train on? It will form some kind of feedback loop on its own outputs and just write shittier and shittier code.