> government can't single out particular speech for consequences. But that obviously isn't happening as you well know. What particular speech is being singled

> government can't single out particular speech for consequences. But that obviously isn't happening as you well know. What particular speech is being singled out against individuals here? "People said that" and so what? The restriction is against a foreign state and agents under its control. It's hard to even argue a court in the US can hear the case given immunities the government enjoys in these situations. The governments right to regulate commerce and foreign relations is in the same constitution that guarantees free speech. Very obviously, no one's political views or speech are persecuted. A US citizen who loves the CCP can become the next owner of tiktok without any issue. What you and this retarded aclu are saying is that a foreign government's ability to conduct business is protected so long as that business allows people to say stuff (with heavy restrictions!)??? I can't believe people donate to this organization. Of all the civil liberities beinf eroded and all the people that can't afford a good lawyer these people choose to waste time and money defending a foreign government.