4 ms·
"he says that our description of nature (that we are using pi) is flawed" Every description we'll ever have will probably be flawed to some degree. I concur t
by backprojection 15y ago
"he says that our description of nature (that we are using pi) is flawed"
Every description we'll ever have will probably be flawed to some degree.
I concur that it's hogwash
- sev 15y agoAgreed. Forget Pi, maybe the way we count is flawed!
- nodemaker 15y agoI think any way of counting will have the same basic axioms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms) Also See What are numbers, and what is their meaning?: Dedekind http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~snburris/htdocs/scav/dedek/dedek.html http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~snburris/htdocs/scav/dedek/ded...