One part I found particularly interesting about this is footnote 27: > While some prompts may be sufficiently creative to be protected by copyright, that does

One part I found particularly interesting about this is footnote 27: > While some prompts may be sufficiently creative to be protected by copyright, that does not mean that material generated from a copyrightable prompt is itself copyrightable. I wonder if this is meant to imply that no possible prompt can produce copyrightable output. What if the prompt already contains expressive elements that the model faithfully reproduces in its output? (For instance, in the limiting case, "Exactly repeat this poem that I wrote: ...") Or perhaps this is meant only in the strict sense, that a creative prompt does not necessarily produce copyrightable output, if the expressive elements in the output originate from the model instead of the prompt.