3 ms·
Not possible to reliably tell apart. The Image generation scene is one thing. For a lot of output, there are still some tells. Text generation though...well goo
by famouswaffles 4y ago
Not possible to reliably tell apart. The Image generation scene is one thing. For a lot of output, there are still some tells. Text generation though...well good luck ever finding that out.
- kevingadd 4y agoIt sounds like the honor system, which is not unprecedented. A lot of governmental systems rely on people to tell the truth when interacting with the government, and then they have to police cases of suspected fraud after the fact. If you were dragged into a copyright suit by someone, you could probably try to prove that the work was AI generated as a defense? Not sure how effective it would be.
- bawolff 4y ago> If you were dragged into a copyright suit by someone, you could probably try to prove that the work was AI generated as a defense? Not sure how effective it would be. It would probably be similar to when wordperfect was sued for including famous painting as clipart. WordPerfect won using basically this defense (that no human creativity went into making the clip art) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Cor....
- tap-snap-or-nap 4y agoGovernment just found a way to expand itself and give out wages for a job that they cannot really do.
- nextlevelwizard 4y agoWho has the burden of proof? Can I just claim everything and anything as “made by AI” and start (ab)using it and then it is up to the original author to proof that it wasn’t actually made by an AI?
- PeterisP 4y agoYou do, in a civil claim its up to you to prove that your rights were actually violated.