3 ms·
And there’s the fact that many tasks don’t need to be perfect. AI is ideal for doing 90% of the legwork in those use cases. Or you could still have a human in
by awb 4y ago
And there’s the fact that many tasks don’t need to be perfect. AI is ideal for doing 90% of the legwork in those use cases.
Or you could still have a human in the loop, for example a CTO reviewing their AI developer’s code. But now you can pay one person instead of 10.
That said, these tools still need some domain knowledge. It’s not at the point yet where anyone off the street can use it to accomplish an unfamiliar task.
There’s an old story about someone charging $1,000 to fix a machine. They did it in 10 seconds and the client complained. The consultant said “I get paid for knowing how to fix it”.
The same might be true for knowing how to prompt AI.