3 ms·
> given our current economic systems What can possibly be the benefit of requiring this constraint? Remove the idea that this is necessary and watch how much
by jMyles 4y ago
> given our current economic systems
What can possibly be the benefit of requiring this constraint?
Remove the idea that this is necessary and watch how much relaxation comes to the deliberation on this topic.
"Current economic systems" will simply have to yield. Along with states. This has been obvious for decades now. Deep breaths, everybody. :-)
- hn_throwaway_99 4y ago> What can possibly be the benefit of requiring this constraint? It's not "requiring this constraint". If you have some plausible pathway to get from our current system to some "Star Trek-like nirvana", I'm all ears. Hand-wavy-ness doesn't cut it. > "Current economic systems" will simply have to yield. Why? For most of human history there were a few overloads and everyone else was starving half the time. Even look at now. I'm guessing you probably live a decent existence in a decent country, but meanwhile billions of people around the world (who can't compete skills-wise with upper income countries) barely eke out an existence. For the world that just lived through the pandemic, do you honestly see systems changing when worldwide cooperation and benevolence is a prerequisite?