3 ms·
A lot of people seem to think we can only accomplish a transition away from fossil fuels after alternatives for fossil fuel driven appliances are available, ful
by mbgerring 4y ago
A lot of people seem to think we can only accomplish a transition away from fossil fuels after alternatives for fossil fuel driven appliances are available, fully scaled up, and cheap. That won’t happen without demand.
Given that nobody cares about their furnace as long as it works, and that in the Bay Area these decisions are made by landlords about every 20 years, who are just trying to get the job done as fast as possible at the lowest price, just banning the gas burning version is a great way to create the necessary demand to accomplish this transition on schedule.*
*”on schedule” here means “in enough time to mitigate climate change enough to prevent the release of exotic diseases from permafrost”
- CoffeeOnWrite 4y agoIt’s not about the appliances, it’s about the energy supply. The California electric grid isn’t super reliable.
- hnav 4y agoprobably need the full 20 years for the grid to catch up, no? this is think global act local taken to an absurd. is burning methane for heat in the bay area really going to melt permafrost? if doing this, why not at least tax the methane to make heat pump TCO seem lower and redirect the extra money into funding crumbling public transit which might actually reduce greenhouse gas from driving.