6 ms·
It makes very little sense to treat depositors as risk takers. These aren't people investing in stocks or bonds. These accounts are places to park your cash. It
by rybosworld 4y ago
It makes very little sense to treat depositors as risk takers. These aren't people investing in stocks or bonds. These accounts are places to park your cash. It would be very bad to discourage deposits.
Putting a ceiling on FDIC insurance is effectively an outdated idea that doesn't work.
Take the example of a company that keeps payroll in a cash account. Let's say that company has 100 employees. Should the FDIC treat the account as belonging to 1 person or 100? If you say 1, I say you are irrational.
- zefalt 4y agoThey are choosing to place money in the bank. This is a risk in and of itself. Companies with treasury departments already know this. They can put money in money market funds, CDARs, cash sweeps, or any other vehicle to protect their cash. There are multiple ways to hold cash with very low duration risk that does not involve putting it in a bank. FDIC is not an outdated idea. It is just the reality of the current financial system because it would require an excess of $20 trillion dollars to insure every deposit in the banks.
- dboreham 4y agoAlthough I knew about the FDIC coverage limit, it seems many did not. I've never had enough cash to test this, but I suppose I assumed if you put $251K in a bank account the web page turns red or something, or a dude calls you up to warn you that the last $1K is at risk. I'm guessing now that doesn't happen.
- sidewndr46 4y agoMost depositors treat US banks as magic entities where they can safely store unlimited amounts of funds. Why, I do not understand.