5 ms·
It would be useful if headlines said "~$10", "sub $100", "sub $1000" et cetera, instead of vague terms like "low-cost".
by grozzle 4y ago
It would be useful if headlines said "~$10", "sub $100", "sub $1000" et cetera, instead of vague terms like "low-cost".
- cinntaile 4y agoAccording to the linked paper in the article it's <2500usd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119692 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119692
- cwkoss 4y agoI wouldn't call that 'low cost'
- segmondy 4y agohow much can you buy one for or build one for?
- SECProto 4y ago> how much can you buy one for or build one for? $10: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/vindriktning-air-quality-sensor-60515911/ https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/vindriktning-air-quality-sensor... presumably not quite feature-comparable, but the article and website are rather absent in report what exactly the "flatburn" is detecting - sounds like "fine particulate" (PM2.5? PM10?) and NO2
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoThis is like comparing apples and Orangutans they are that different
- henearkr 4y agoThere is no NO2 sensor in the BOM.
- malfist 4y ago$640: https://shop.air-q.com/air-Q-pro-air-analyser-14-sensors https://shop.air-q.com/air-Q-pro-air-analyser-14-sensors Or if you're building yourself, $35: https://sensirion.com/products/catalog/SEN55 https://sensirion.com/products/catalog/SEN55 Both include NO sensors.
- henearkr 4y agoThe second link seems pretty cool, and cheap!! Have you experience playing with it? In particular, I wonder how usable it is with e.g. a Linux laptop. It looks like the device uses a I2C interface.