5 ms·
> It's much cheaper to throw a person at GPT-X than actually "waste" an hour or two interviewing. It’s even cheaper to just draw names at random out of a hat,
by Jevon23 4y ago
> It's much cheaper to throw a person at GPT-X than actually "waste" an hour or two interviewing.
It’s even cheaper to just draw names at random out of a hat, but universities don’t do that. Clearly there is some other standard at work.
- smrtinsert 4y agoHard to build a fiefdom of loyalty with an AI...
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 4y agoUniversities should just set minimum standards and then randomly pick among all the qualified applicants until the class is full.
- Jensson 4y agoAnd then the minimum standard will be set so that exactly as many students as they need will pass it.
- vba616 4y agoI am wondering if you mean that to be a startling or radical idea. Not necessarily universities, but I do think that lotteries to determine admissions to schools is a real thing. Magnet schools or something? I don't know first hand.
- PebblesRox 4y agoIt's a straightforward idea in my mind and I'm always happy to see people talking about it.
- vba616 4y agoYeah, I'm saying real examples may be useful to reduce resistance.
- Nasrudith 4y agoLotteries tend to be used more for lower levels which are to prepare students. That is a rather substantial difference.