> a company can use the same screening process for different teams - it made a lot of sense to me that a task like that could be outsourced It actually makes a

> a company can use the same screening process for different teams - it made a lot of sense to me that a task like that could be outsourced It actually makes a lot of sense to do it this way on both ends. You know the interviewer is going to be a good interviewer who knows what they are doing & how to judge you. The interviewer can be completely independent from the decision without having bias or judgement attached to where the candidate ends up. I've certainly had interviews where I knew I was doomed from the second I walked in the door because the interviewer was in a bad mood, they didn't enunciate clearly, just a bad vibe, whatever. That sucks as a candidate. This situation would make a fairly demeaning process slightly better if done well.