3 ms·
That's just their FAQ, which is meaningless since it isn't legally binding. What EULA do they require of end users?
by sidewndr46 4y ago
That's just their FAQ, which is meaningless since it isn't legally binding.
What EULA do they require of end users?
- snuxoll 4y agoNot a customer and their access agreement isn't public, but terminating a contract in retribution for redistributing their patch would be a violation of the GPL's "no further restrictions" clause and thus they would be in breach. If they're pulling a stunt like that somebody with big enough pockets only needs to file a lawsuit.
- jraph 4y agoI don't think that's true. "If you redistribute we stop collaboration" is not a restriction on the source code the customer has access to. I think this clause doesn't mean what you mean. This clause means that the GRSecurity project can't license their modifications under a more restrictive license than the GPL. Which the GRSecurity project respects, customers do have access to the modifications under the GPL license.
- pabs3 4y agoOne of those customers also redistributed GRSec modifications: https://github.com/jameshilliard/linux-grsec https://github.com/jameshilliard/linux-grsec