There is a ridiculous game of telephone and this is shitty science journalism. >The report offers a decision tree to help researchers choose whether race, ethn

There is a ridiculous game of telephone and this is shitty science journalism. >The report offers a decision tree to help researchers choose whether race, ethnicity or indigeneity, geography, genetic ancestry, or genetic similarity are most appropriate for their work. So, "We can't define 'race' so stop using it in science" is a factually incorrect description of the report and is instead click bait journalism intended incite controversy where none exists.