Your example here is obvious right? All humans agree with you because all humans can tell the difference. The thing with these LLMs is that it's exhibiting bot

Your example here is obvious right? All humans agree with you because all humans can tell the difference. The thing with these LLMs is that it's exhibiting both seemingly random remixes and remixes with extreme creativity. A lot of people see some error and flaw with chatGPT or they don't dig deep enough and they miss the fact that there are many instances of intelligent remixing of creative data. Real creativity. Trust that the opposing party has the intelligence to not be tricked by some obvious answer that an LLM took from a look up table and that the opposing party saw something wholly novel and unique. The main issue here is that people are getting hung up on the part where chatGPT fails to be creative and are completely missing the fact that it can be successful as well.