5 ms·
My observation of this matter: working ineffectively leads to burnout and (if it's let to go too far) depression. That occurs whether it's 20 hours per week or
by michaelochurch 15y ago
My observation of this matter: working ineffectively leads to burnout and (if it's let to go too far) depression. That occurs whether it's 20 hours per week or 70. I don't think "long hours" are dangerous if the hours are effective, engaged hours that produce meaningful results. It's actually possible to work 45-60 hours per week effectively and sustainably, but only (a) from a position of complete autonomy over what one does and how and when one does it, (b) with a mix of labor (some social, some hard-core cognitive like coding), (c) with strict attention to diet and exercise, (d) with enough reward (and I'm talking about achievement and recognition far more than remuneration) coming from that work, and (e) with the resources to outsource all housework and most errands, because at 60 hpw you don't even want to fucking think about washing dishes.
That said, the longer the hours are, the higher the probability that one is no longer working effectively. A 13-hour coding day can be fun, but it's rare that a person can string 7 of those together in a row. And a 13-hour day spent mostly in tense meatings ("typo" intentional) will kill you.
This can be reinforced by the fact that the first stage of ineffectiveness is mid-level (non-paralytic) anxiety, not panic attacks (a harsh warning sign that usually slows people down) or major depression (outright showstopper).
Actually, I think the reason why there are a lot of micromanagers in the world is that they tend to be people who linger in that twilight stage of declining effectiveness, and that it's possible (in a managerial role) for this state to be stable. Managers at level-1 burnout (non-paralytic anxiety) get the "I'm the only one who can do this shit competently" complex and become micromanagers. In a subordinate, this state quickly (~3 months at most) progresses to level 2 (paralytic anxiety, panic attacks) or even 3 (crippling mental illness, "nervous breakdown")... either of which is likely to end that job one way or another, but a lot of people enjoy power and that means that a person in authority can stay at a level-1 low-burn for a long time.
- pasbesoin 15y agoI'm going to glom on to your comment to make a personal observation about the ineffectiveness, inefficiency, and frustration of needlessly noisy, distracting work environments. A full day or even long day of being really productive can be energizing. You can't do that non-stop, all day, every day (meaning from waking to sleeping), but it can be a powerful feeling to really "get stuff done". Waiting for your neighbors to shut up so that you can actually think things through, for the umpteenth status meeting to grind its way through more or less "reading the memo", and working on far less than optimal equipment? Not so much. It's all been said before. But if management wants to fix the problem (hint: often they don't, really), best to actually identify the problem, not a symptom.