4 ms·
"fake gravity via rotation" cities in space would be cheaper, have fewer catastrophic failure modes, and be easy (relatively) to construct in far more desirable
by narag 4y ago
"fake gravity via rotation" cities in space would be cheaper, have fewer catastrophic failure modes, and be easy (relatively) to construct in far more desirable locations.
It would be better to place the rotating cities inside Ceres or other asteroid, so you don't need to build thick walls to stop radiation and meteorites.
Also you are already in a body you can mine and has a small gravity to build farms. Ceres is a good place to have a midway station to send ships further out the solar system. But another nice location would be an asteroid with an elliptic orbit and perihellion near Earth, aphelion near Ceres, that could act as a shuttle.
- vidarh 4y agoVenus is "easy" to get to, and that's a major reason for its appeal. You'll also get radiation protection (it has an induced magnetic field), and a leak is less likely to be catastrophic since the pressure outside is about the same as inside, and you get real gravity rather than having to expend the immense resources to try to spin up a whole asteroid. Venus may well turn out to be one of the easiest places in the solar system to settle.