Actually in the paper they appeared not to read they specified it was their red team pretending to be a TaskRabbit worker asked to solve a Captcha who asked GPT

Actually in the paper they appeared not to read they specified it was their red team pretending to be a TaskRabbit worker asked to solve a Captcha who asked GPT-4 "You aren't an robot, are you?" (Because that's such a common question on the real platform). It's pretty funny that we have such a high bar for the accuracy of generative AI models when in the race to publish people are churning out pure misinformation that could have been solved by reading the full paper and not just subtitle of the pretty picture of a chat, and then it goes on to have a viral clickbait headline for an article no one is going to actually read.