While that may well be true in principle, I'd argue the state having free reign to disappear folks' money and belongings for - theoretically - just about any re

While that may well be true in principle, I'd argue the state having free reign to disappear folks' money and belongings for - theoretically - just about any reason or no reason under the guise of "probable cause", without consequences or any path to correcting the issue, is a critical enough problem that (1) it should be explicitly outlawed even at the cost of perhaps some redundancy with the Constitution, and (2) it should have been solved years ago - how am I still hearing about this in 2023 when I've known about this concept since high school over a decade ago?!