My impression is that Apple reviewers have evolved beyond thinking about submissions. Now they have become pattern matchers. That is, they are trying to fit a

My impression is that Apple reviewers have evolved beyond thinking about submissions. Now they have become pattern matchers. That is, they are trying to fit a submission to a known reject-able stereotype. Sometimes while the fit seems reasonable, it is not reasonable as a thoughtful review of the entire submission would show. I don't see how this problem could be avoided.