> I guess that something that involves "animated violence" like pokemon might be a good idea to get around that. I feel like this is a bigger thing than people

> I guess that something that involves "animated violence" like pokemon might be a good idea to get around that. I feel like this is a bigger thing than people realize. Changing creative output to match the proposed ethical boundaries of a corporation that you're beholden to by using their tool seems like such a new leap to hoist onto the public en-masse. I presume somewhere there is an agreement that forbids the use of 'notepad.exe' in matters of anti-state espionage, homicide, whatever; but this is the first time that a tool is actually good at self-checking to make sure that the license /whatever is upheld rigidly -- and I feel as if that has far-reaching effects on not just the creative output but the thinking structures for those that are involved in the use of such tools. If you know that the tool that you're using forbids certain things, you're either going to think about using it for other things or pursue other tools; given that openAI is effectively the only game in town right now they seem to be in a unique position to affect change in the way people are thinking about using these tools. this could be good or bad, I don't really sway one way or another, but it seems important .