3 ms·

Torvalds makes the same mistake that many other people make when evaluating politicians - he takes them at face value. If being reasonable and open-minded were

Torvalds makes the same mistake that many other people make when evaluating politicians - he takes them at face value. If being reasonable and open-minded were qualities that were highly valued by voters, then politicians would hire coaches to help them practice seeming reasonable and open-minded. In fact, this is one of the things that concerns me most about Obama. I too like the fact that he sounds like a reasonable man in interviews and he seems to value his opponents' aguments. But his voting record shows none of that. By his words, he is a deeply thoughtful man. By his actions, he is a hyper-partisan. George Bush has taught me to evaluate politicians by their actions, not their words. Ironically, if being open-minded were your highest priority for a politician, then John McCain's actions (though not his words) would place him among the best of any living politician.

sharkfish 18y ago
If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently. Also, I'm glad we have so many people in this country who understand that the economy is driven by the working people, not the wealthy. I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984. But most of all, like Linus, I'm worried about black/white thinkers. I am happy knowing that Obama as a future president, at least shows _evidence_ that he understands multiple perspectives on a problem and can think through contradicting positions to come to a rational conclusion. Too often, difficult decisions seem to have been made, these past 8 years, based on religious views.
- Prrometheus 18y ago
  >I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984. From a civil liberties perspective, I am not comforted by Obama's capitulations on FISA and the PATRIOT Act, and neither am I comforted by his choice of one of the fiercest enemies of privacy in Congress as his running mate. Biden bragged that he "wrote the PATRIOT Act", and he was the originator of the office of the Drug Czar. You may think Obama is better than McCain, and that is your right, but lets have an honest view of his actions in mind when we make that choice.
  - mattmaroon 18y ago
    You basically just mentioned two areas where both candidates somewhat agree. If you widen your scope at all, you see there's a clear difference. Obama's pro gay civil unions and pro choice. He's against torture (which McCain claims to be against, but then voted to essentially give the administration a pass on). He's for habeas corpus for detainees. On the overall topic of civil liberties, it's not even a contest. McCain's views are much closer to those of the people who once held him prisoner than they are anyone who gives a shit about civil liberties. Oh, and Obama is pro net neutrality, McCain isn't. If you can present one instance of McCain supporting a single civil liberty that Obama does not, I'd love to hear it, because I can present scores of the opposite. Is that an honest enough view?
    - alecco 18y ago
      Obama's campaign was caught changing their stance on Net neutrality after Biden was nominated. http://versionista.com/diff/JAS9LMr5qU7q8BSroV8KzQ/ http://versionista.com/diff/JAS9LMr5qU7q8BSroV8KzQ/
      - sharkfish 18y ago
        He removed much of the verbiage but he still supports net neutrality (as evidenced in your link).
        alecco 18y ago
        I didn't say he stopped supporting Net Neutrality. I only said his campaign was caught changing their stance. Not even Obama himself, as I'm sure he doesn't have time to review edits on his website.
        Retric 18y ago
        If your read the old copy of his page it was much harder for an average voter to understand. So some staffer "cleaned it up" but there is no evidence he changed his mind on that topic.
- byrneseyeview 18y ago
  If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently. Can you explain your argument? It sounds like you're implying "If you had more information, you would reach a different conclusion," but what you're really saying is "If you were subjected to different emotional pressures, you would ignore evidence and come to a new conclusion." I mean, if a judge is deciding a case against Philip Morris, and has all of his retirement money in Philip Morris stock, he's going to see things differently -- but it's not going to improve his decision.
  - sharkfish 18y ago
    It seems to me that people with children in the war are more likely to want a leader that supports getting out of the war sooner rather than "staying the course". Anecdotal, of course, but the people I know who have been over there or who have children in the war claim they don't see that we are going to accomplish much and want to the US to leave Iraq as soon as is feasible. Whereas McCain is more about winning the war, my impression of Obama and from his statements, is that Obama is not so much about winning as much as wanting the war to come to a reasonable end. So yes, if you had an investment in the war personally, you would probably have more direct information rather than propaganda about the war. Regardless of your emotions.
jhancock 18y ago
ok, you had me until the last paragraph at which point you stuffed in your love for McCain ("place him among the best of any living politician") without providing anything to back that up. Precisely what "actions" over the last 8 years would you point to that prove McCain so "open-minded"? And yes, I do mean over the last 8 years. I am a "what have you done for me lately" kind of guy. Torvolds' blog post is well written. Most none of us gets to meet the people we vote for in person. We have to settle for what we feel and perceive. It is not black and white.
- Prrometheus 18y ago
  I have no love for McCain; I'm certainly not voting for him. However, he is famous for supporting causes on both sides of the partisan divide (ex. supporting global warming measures, opposing the Bush tax cuts, supporting the Iraq War, supporting open immigration, etc). It would be hard to detect a coherent ideology in his voting patterns. That is why his selection in the primary process gave self-described "conservatives" fits.
  - mattmaroon 18y ago
    That's true on some parts (though supporting Iraq was never crossing party lines) but I think you have to judge by both words and actions. His actions told one story, but then as soon as it came time to run for the big office his words reversed. He went from preaching against the agents of intolerance to nominating one as his VP. You have to assume that if he is elected, he will do most of what he says he will and live up to his words of late. He will keep or further the Bush tax cuts (or try to anyway) despite having been previously opposed to them because to do otherwise would greatly lessen his chances of reelection. Even 2nd term Presidents, who have that pressure removed, still try to stay close to their promises for the next guy from their party. If anything, their words are probably a better predictor of future actions, since they'll be held accountable. Every time they do something opposite of what they promised, the Daily Show will roll the video they archived.
    - Prrometheus 18y ago
bayareaguy 18y ago
John McCain's actions (though not his words) would place him among the best of any living politician Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "best". He certainly appeals to Americans who respect those who avoid responsibility and act in their own self interest. He strikes me as the kind of person who is likely to find a way out of past promises when a better deal comes along. How else would could you explain the way he abandoned his crippled wife for a pretty rich lady twenty years younger then himself? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-J... How else to explain the many ways he's changed his position since 2000 in order to gain favor with the far right? http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1779141 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1779141 or his new position on torture? http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-torture-veto http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-torture-veto
- astine 18y ago
  Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "best" This is what he meant: if being open-minded were your highest priority for a politician If you had bean reading, you would have noticed this and spared us, yet another diatribe against a man that nobody here likes.
  - bayareaguy 18y ago
    Given the corrupting environment in which they work, I don't think being "open-minded" about solicitations and temptations to be a good thing for a politician, especially when it leads to breaking commitments.
    - astine 18y ago
      If you find it necessary to point that out, then you missed the entire point of the post.
deleted 18y ago
[deleted]
dejb 18y ago
> George Bush has taught me to evaluate politicians by their actions, not their words. To me his words, actions and the results were all pretty consistent. Only the scale of failure of his presidency was a surprise... And the fact that he was voted in twice. You sound like you may have been one of his 'x2' voters. If this was the case it doesn't present the best credentials to be lecturing others on candidate selection.

sharkfish 18y ago

If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently. Also, I'm glad we have so many people in this country who understand that the economy is driven by the working people, not the wealthy. I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984. But most of all, like Linus, I'm worried about black/white thinkers. I am happy knowing that Obama as a future president, at least shows _evidence_ that he understands multiple perspectives on a problem and can think through contradicting positions to come to a rational conclusion. Too often, difficult decisions seem to have been made, these past 8 years, based on religious views.

Prrometheus 18y ago
>I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984. From a civil liberties perspective, I am not comforted by Obama's capitulations on FISA and the PATRIOT Act, and neither am I comforted by his choice of one of the fiercest enemies of privacy in Congress as his running mate. Biden bragged that he "wrote the PATRIOT Act", and he was the originator of the office of the Drug Czar. You may think Obama is better than McCain, and that is your right, but lets have an honest view of his actions in mind when we make that choice.
- mattmaroon 18y ago
  You basically just mentioned two areas where both candidates somewhat agree. If you widen your scope at all, you see there's a clear difference. Obama's pro gay civil unions and pro choice. He's against torture (which McCain claims to be against, but then voted to essentially give the administration a pass on). He's for habeas corpus for detainees. On the overall topic of civil liberties, it's not even a contest. McCain's views are much closer to those of the people who once held him prisoner than they are anyone who gives a shit about civil liberties. Oh, and Obama is pro net neutrality, McCain isn't. If you can present one instance of McCain supporting a single civil liberty that Obama does not, I'd love to hear it, because I can present scores of the opposite. Is that an honest enough view?
  - alecco 18y ago
    Obama's campaign was caught changing their stance on Net neutrality after Biden was nominated. http://versionista.com/diff/JAS9LMr5qU7q8BSroV8KzQ/ http://versionista.com/diff/JAS9LMr5qU7q8BSroV8KzQ/
    - sharkfish 18y ago
      He removed much of the verbiage but he still supports net neutrality (as evidenced in your link).
      - alecco 18y ago
        I didn't say he stopped supporting Net Neutrality. I only said his campaign was caught changing their stance. Not even Obama himself, as I'm sure he doesn't have time to review edits on his website.
        Retric 18y ago
        If your read the old copy of his page it was much harder for an average voter to understand. So some staffer "cleaned it up" but there is no evidence he changed his mind on that topic.
byrneseyeview 18y ago
If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently. Can you explain your argument? It sounds like you're implying "If you had more information, you would reach a different conclusion," but what you're really saying is "If you were subjected to different emotional pressures, you would ignore evidence and come to a new conclusion." I mean, if a judge is deciding a case against Philip Morris, and has all of his retirement money in Philip Morris stock, he's going to see things differently -- but it's not going to improve his decision.
- sharkfish 18y ago
  It seems to me that people with children in the war are more likely to want a leader that supports getting out of the war sooner rather than "staying the course". Anecdotal, of course, but the people I know who have been over there or who have children in the war claim they don't see that we are going to accomplish much and want to the US to leave Iraq as soon as is feasible. Whereas McCain is more about winning the war, my impression of Obama and from his statements, is that Obama is not so much about winning as much as wanting the war to come to a reasonable end. So yes, if you had an investment in the war personally, you would probably have more direct information rather than propaganda about the war. Regardless of your emotions.

jhancock 18y ago

ok, you had me until the last paragraph at which point you stuffed in your love for McCain ("place him among the best of any living politician") without providing anything to back that up. Precisely what "actions" over the last 8 years would you point to that prove McCain so "open-minded"? And yes, I do mean over the last 8 years. I am a "what have you done for me lately" kind of guy. Torvolds' blog post is well written. Most none of us gets to meet the people we vote for in person. We have to settle for what we feel and perceive. It is not black and white.

Prrometheus 18y ago
I have no love for McCain; I'm certainly not voting for him. However, he is famous for supporting causes on both sides of the partisan divide (ex. supporting global warming measures, opposing the Bush tax cuts, supporting the Iraq War, supporting open immigration, etc). It would be hard to detect a coherent ideology in his voting patterns. That is why his selection in the primary process gave self-described "conservatives" fits.
- mattmaroon 18y ago
  That's true on some parts (though supporting Iraq was never crossing party lines) but I think you have to judge by both words and actions. His actions told one story, but then as soon as it came time to run for the big office his words reversed. He went from preaching against the agents of intolerance to nominating one as his VP. You have to assume that if he is elected, he will do most of what he says he will and live up to his words of late. He will keep or further the Bush tax cuts (or try to anyway) despite having been previously opposed to them because to do otherwise would greatly lessen his chances of reelection. Even 2nd term Presidents, who have that pressure removed, still try to stay close to their promises for the next guy from their party. If anything, their words are probably a better predictor of future actions, since they'll be held accountable. Every time they do something opposite of what they promised, the Daily Show will roll the video they archived.
  - Prrometheus 18y ago

bayareaguy 18y ago

John McCain's actions (though not his words) would place him among the best of any living politician Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "best". He certainly appeals to Americans who respect those who avoid responsibility and act in their own self interest. He strikes me as the kind of person who is likely to find a way out of past promises when a better deal comes along. How else would could you explain the way he abandoned his crippled wife for a pretty rich lady twenty years younger then himself? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-J... How else to explain the many ways he's changed his position since 2000 in order to gain favor with the far right? http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1779141 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1779141 or his new position on torture? http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-torture-veto http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-torture-veto

astine 18y ago
Well, I suppose it depends on what you mean by "best" This is what he meant: if being open-minded were your highest priority for a politician If you had bean reading, you would have noticed this and spared us, yet another diatribe against a man that nobody here likes.
- bayareaguy 18y ago
  Given the corrupting environment in which they work, I don't think being "open-minded" about solicitations and temptations to be a good thing for a politician, especially when it leads to breaking commitments.
  - astine 18y ago
    If you find it necessary to point that out, then you missed the entire point of the post.

deleted 18y ago

[deleted]

dejb 18y ago

> George Bush has taught me to evaluate politicians by their actions, not their words. To me his words, actions and the results were all pretty consistent. Only the scale of failure of his presidency was a surprise... And the fact that he was voted in twice. You sound like you may have been one of his 'x2' voters. If this was the case it doesn't present the best credentials to be lecturing others on candidate selection.