4 ms·
My understanding is they legally can't. It was trained used OpenAI, which doesn't allow using their output to train new models. Someone would need to find anoth
by itake 4y ago
My understanding is they legally can't. It was trained used OpenAI, which doesn't allow using their output to train new models. Someone would need to find another data source to fine tune llama.
- sdrg822 4y agoIt’s only a matter of time
- hackernewds 4y agowaiting for the stable diffusion version of gpt still
- dwallin 4y agoYou don't need to find a new data source, you just need to find an unencumbered third party. You can use the that data publicly provided in the git repo as long as you haven't signed an agreement with OpenAI yourself.
- Zetice 4y agoWhat will OpenAI do, sue? Okay but now it's out there.
- nwoli 4y agoAlso how could that even be under protection. As if they haven’t been scraping copyrighted materials and sites with end user agreements to train the model in the first place
- TaylorAlexander 4y agoI believe the work was done by Stanford, so OpenAI could revoke Stanford's access to their API. That would inhibit Stanford's ability to do new research with this system.
- jerpint 4y agoOpenAI I knows they’re just a few cycles behind open source models - probably why they stuck a deal early with Microsoft.
- hawski 4y agoWhy they can train their model on copyrighted data and claiming fair use as they do not outright copy while disallowing training other models on their output? I understand revoking access though.
- alwayslikethis 4y agoThey realistically can not, I believe. If Microsoft is right that this is under fair use, then you are only limited by OpenAI ToS, which also says that the copyright of generated content belongs to the user. Do the following: Person A uses GPT3 to generate training data, and publish it on his blog, without representing it as human generated. Person A does not give permission for it to be used by Alpaca team. Alpaca team comes along, scrape his blog, and uses it as training data, without permission from person A. Now this is fair use, so there is nothing person A can do to stop it, just like how Github scraped our code for Copilot without permission.