I'm torn. On one hand, porn has little artistic merit, and is not uplifting, so it shouldn't have copyright protection. On the other hand, the act of content

I'm torn. On one hand, porn has little artistic merit, and is not uplifting, so it shouldn't have copyright protection. On the other hand, the act of content creation is sacred, enough so that the content creator and their heirs or successors in interest have a right to a very long, state enforced monopoly. I don't know how this should fall out