3 ms·

Any way we can speed that up a little? /s Jokes aside, could anyone knowledgeable explain why this comes down to a probability. Isn't the speed and direction o

Any way we can speed that up a little? /s Jokes aside, could anyone knowledgeable explain why this comes down to a probability. Isn't the speed and direction of objects traveling in space constant and predictable? What are the unknown variables?

NotYourLawyer 4y ago
Uncertainty in the measurement of its position and velocity.
- prophesi 4y ago
  Measuring its current position and velocity isn't the hard part, it's chaos theory and the n-body problem for its future position/velocity.
accrual 4y ago
Yes, but only with sufficient observation. Since this body was recently discovered, there likely hasn't been enough observation time to know the direction and velocity of the object with great certainty. The more we observe it, the better we'll know where it'll be in 20 years.
lisper 4y ago
The speed and direction of objects moving through space is deterministic, but it is neither constant (obviously) nor completely predictable except in very special cases. In general the motion of systems of three or more bodies are chaotic, i.e. very small changes in initial conditions can result in very large changes in position and velocity in the future. Also, we can't measure positions and velocities with infinite precision. This has nothing to do with quantum mechanics, it's just that the data that comes out of our instruments has finite precision and so there will always be measurement errors. Finally, earth is a very small target, so figuring out whether something will hit it requires a lot of precision. Also, quoting from the original article: "Often when new objects are first discovered, it takes several weeks of data to reduce the uncertainties and adequately predict their orbits years into the future."
robotsteve2 4y ago
1. Uncertainty in the speed, direction, position. 2. Uncertainty in the model (e.g. influence of external bodies besides the sun and earth). Kinematic motion models are exact but our knowledge of all the variables involved is not.

NotYourLawyer 4y ago

Uncertainty in the measurement of its position and velocity.

prophesi 4y ago
Measuring its current position and velocity isn't the hard part, it's chaos theory and the n-body problem for its future position/velocity.

accrual 4y ago

Yes, but only with sufficient observation. Since this body was recently discovered, there likely hasn't been enough observation time to know the direction and velocity of the object with great certainty. The more we observe it, the better we'll know where it'll be in 20 years.

lisper 4y ago

The speed and direction of objects moving through space is deterministic, but it is neither constant (obviously) nor completely predictable except in very special cases. In general the motion of systems of three or more bodies are chaotic, i.e. very small changes in initial conditions can result in very large changes in position and velocity in the future. Also, we can't measure positions and velocities with infinite precision. This has nothing to do with quantum mechanics, it's just that the data that comes out of our instruments has finite precision and so there will always be measurement errors. Finally, earth is a very small target, so figuring out whether something will hit it requires a lot of precision. Also, quoting from the original article: "Often when new objects are first discovered, it takes several weeks of data to reduce the uncertainties and adequately predict their orbits years into the future."

robotsteve2 4y ago

1. Uncertainty in the speed, direction, position. 2. Uncertainty in the model (e.g. influence of external bodies besides the sun and earth). Kinematic motion models are exact but our knowledge of all the variables involved is not.