>Podman is backed by much larger corporate machinery. If anyone thinks that Podman "winning" is a good thing then you've played right in to Walsh's antics. I'm

>Podman is backed by much larger corporate machinery. If anyone thinks that Podman "winning" is a good thing then you've played right in to Walsh's antics. I'm not making a moral judgement. I'm just saying that docker had serious technical problems and docker the business sucked at monetizing it. Docker played into red hat's tactics. I've never heard of Matt Walsh and frankly, I've wanted rootless containers for years before I ever heard of podman. >Podman wasn't built out of necessity but out of fiscal competitive maneuvering. Becuase red hat is a business not a charity. I doubt they would have built a better docker if docker wasn't refusing to improve.