3 ms·
OTOH, Docker didn't want to support a lot of features that enterprise customers wanted, like self-hosted private registries, because they wanted people using Do
by dralley 4y ago
OTOH, Docker didn't want to support a lot of features that enterprise customers wanted, like self-hosted private registries, because they wanted people using Dockerhub.
And wasn't the runtime problems because Docker was very very late to adopting CGroups v2?
- cozzyd 4y agoYes cgroupsv2 was a big problem for docker on EL8 for a long time.
- freedomben 4y agoYes exactly. GP is misinformed on history. Red hat didn't sabotage anything. Docker took forever to update to cgroups V2, and that broke it for distros like fedora that are up to date. The user had to downgrade their kernel in order to use docker, but if they did everything else worked fine.
- windexh8er 4y agoWhile you have a valid point with cgroups I never stated anything about "sabotage". So let's not play the misinformed card and then go on making things up. As for Red Hat and their games of not supporting Docker, even after cgroups were addressed Red Hat never officially supported Docker as a runtime. How do I know this? Because at the time I was working with paying clients of RHEL/OpenShift and was on calls regarding said customers being forced to use inferior (their words) RHEL tooling. So while your history may have not seen the games Red Hat was playing, they surely were.