4 ms·

It’s literally OCI compatible, integrates with systemd and LSM, and runs rootless by default. Podman is 100000% better designed on the inside with the same inte

It’s literally OCI compatible, integrates with systemd and LSM, and runs rootless by default. Podman is 100000% better designed on the inside with the same interface on the outside.

dontlaugh 4y ago
It’s the lack of fully compatible compose that matters most.
- jacooper 4y ago
  Podman appears to support the compose v2 spec, and the socket API, but still not fully supporting buildkit. https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/podman-compose-docker-compose https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/podman-compose-docker-compos...
jacooper 4y ago
Rootless networking is still a mess with no IP source propagation and much slower performance. So for most users docker with userNS-remapping is actually a better choice. Also systemd integration isn't a plus for me, I don't want to deal with SystemD just to have a container start on startup.
- yrro 4y ago
  I think --network=pasta: helps with source IP preservation. Regardless that has never bothered me since I'm only using podman or docker for local development...
  - jacooper 4y ago
    Hmmm, pasta seems to solve all rootless networking issues... https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/16141 https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/16141