4 ms·
Pages 3 and 4 in the PDF. The redactions leave some questions, but the avaialble text directly confirms what smokinn and the Techcrunch article wrote.
by lurker17 15y ago
Pages 3 and 4 in the PDF. The redactions leave some questions, but the avaialble text directly confirms what smokinn and the Techcrunch article wrote.
- aptwebapps 15y agoNot trying to make light of the seriousness of the allegations, but where's the bit about notifying the current employer? I scanned those pages (and bracketing pages) and didn't see it.
- mattmanser 15y agoPage 5, line 9: The documents also demonstrate that Defendants did not extend an offer to an employee of another Defendant without prior approval from the candidate's current employer, regardless of whether the candidate applied without being solicited first.
- aptwebapps 15y agoThanks, missed that.