>The article further explains why that may not work out. The article is basically anti-nuclear propaganda, with its conclusions based on the same lack of under

>The article further explains why that may not work out. The article is basically anti-nuclear propaganda, with its conclusions based on the same lack of understanding and fear that's always been the problem. I wouldn't be surprised to see the US extend the life of existing nuclear plants and potentially even build a few more of the old design when push comes to shove. In time climate change will force the government to act, and if the new reactor types aren't ready and the needed breakthroughs in energy storage plus the needed world wide smart grid to enable renewables, there won't be another choice.