I just asked ChatGPT for something today; I framed it in terms of a question in an attempt not to influence it - is there a...? And it told me firmly "yes" fol

I just asked ChatGPT for something today; I framed it in terms of a question in an attempt not to influence it - is there a...? And it told me firmly "yes" followed by fiction, with a plausible link that went nowhere. Honestly, I'm not entirely sure it was complete fiction, it was so plausible and what I wanted to hear. But I couldn't find it with Google. What's bothering me is not just people saying this is like a human being, but people saying the next generation, the progression will bring us closer to a human mind. "Better", if it is more deceptive, will be worse. Improving what it is already good at will produce something but not a human-like mind and not a superhuman oracle. Humans have eyeballs, but an artificial eye is never going to be a human-like mind no matter how much you develop it and whether it is better or worse than a human eye.