4 ms·
This is so silly. Just because radical change is alienating doesn’t mean that smaller improvements wouldn't be positively received. For example, an end to silen
by alanh 4y ago
This is so silly. Just because radical change is alienating doesn’t mean that smaller improvements wouldn't be positively received. For example, an end to silently swallowing emoji would be an improvement, not a regression. Poor design that actually excludes people is not a treasured feature.
- atq2119 4y agoI'll bite: How does swallowing emoji exclude people?
- antifa 4y agoIt excludes annoying people who use emojis. I just wish it was updated to include removing the ascii emojis they unnecessarily add, often at the end of posts :)
- 5e92cb50239222b 4y agoIf a feature excludes a certain kind of people, it might very well be an improvement.
- adql 4y agoExcluding people that want to shove emoji in is morally good thing.
- dahfizz 4y agoI treasure not having to look at emojis on HN. Not sure who this "excludes" but I'm fine that that