> I think there is a strong argument to be made that if you need a lot of unsafe, Zig is going to be the safer language. I could see that. Haven't used zig but

> I think there is a strong argument to be made that if you need a lot of unsafe, Zig is going to be the safer language. I could see that. Haven't used zig but it does look very nice. > in many places where unsafe ends up required Yes, I definitely agree. I was specifically referring to the boundary of safe rust. I don't know how much more or less safe unsafe rust is vs c, but I do know that safe rust is certainly safer than c.